Page 79 - AJWEP-v22i2
P. 79

Flood risk assessment of Barak river valley

                 Table 2. (Continued)
                 Class name/description      Pixel   Percentage  Number  % of the  Frequency            SE
                                             count      (%)     of floods  number    ratio    Pij   Ej   h=1‑e j  Wj
                                                                          of floods
                 Geology                                                                                  0.472  0.12
                  Neogene sedimentary rock  16,390,344  48.59      47      38.84     0.80     0.04 −0.06
                  Paleogene sedimentary rock  13,106,647  38.86     0      0.00      0.00     0.00   0
                  Quaternary sediments     4,126,165    12.23      69      57.02     4.66     0.25 −0.15
                  Tertiary sedimentary rock   107,931   0.32        5      4.13      12.91    0.70 −0.11
                 Sum                                                                 18.38    1.00 0.528
                 Distance from road                                                                       0.896  0.22
                  <1000                    17,186,661   50.95      119     98.35     1.93     0.96 −0.02
                  1000 – 2000              6,918,887    20.51       2      1.65      0.08     0.04 −0.06
                  2000 – 3000              3,760,359    11.15       0      0.00      0.00      0     0
                  3000 – 4000              2,113,104    6.26        0      0.00      0.00      0     0
                  >4000                    3,752,077    11.12       0      0.00      0.00      0     0
                 Sum                                                                 2.01     1.00 0.104
                 Distance from river                                                                      0.043  0.01
                  <500                     1,827,179    5.42       10      8.26      1.53     0.26 −0.15
                  500 – 1000               6,529,764    19.36      29      23.97     1.24     0.21 −0.14
                  1000 – 1500              7,023,579    20.82      38      31.40     1.51     0.26 −0.15
                  1500 – 2000              6,069,805    17.99      25      20.66     1.15     0.20 −0.14
                  >2000                    12,280,761   36.41      19      15.70     0.43     0.07 −0.08
                 Sum                                                                 5.85     1.00 0.957
                 Elevation                                                                                 1     0.25
                  <250                     11,146,025   33.04      121    100.00     3.03      1     0
                  250 – 500                5,200,503    15.42       0      0.00      0.00      0     0
                  500 – 750                5,330,397    15.80       0      0.00      0.00      0     0
                  750 – 1000               4,699,604    13.93       0      0.00      0.00      0     0
                  >1000                    7,359,918    21.82       0      0.00      0.00      0     0
                 Sum                                                                 3.03      1     0
                 Abbreviation: SE: Shannon’s entropy.

                parameter of flood damage. The road distance layer of   elevation model was used for stream extraction. The
                the study has been delineated on both sides of roads   distance from the river was delineated on both sides
                using the Euclidean distance method in GIS.         of  vectorized  streams  using  the  Euclidean  distance
                                                                    method in GIS.
                4.1.8. Distance from river
                The distance from a river is a key factor in determining   4.2. Flood hazard analysis and validation
                the severity and reach of a flood. Areas closer to the river   Flood susceptibility  maps were created  using GIS
                are generally at greater risk of more intense flooding   (Figure  4).  These maps were based on the relative
                and a wider spread of floodwater.  According to Wang   importance  of  different  flood  conditioning  factors,  as
                                              27
                et al.,  globally, a trend of relocating away from flood-  determined by FR and Shannon entropy analyses. An
                     36
                inundated areas was observed in 53% of countries from   FSI was calculated by combining information from all
                2000 to 2018, which ultimately resulted in a reduction   identified  flood-inducing  factors.  Higher  FSI  values
                in  flood  exposure,  fatalities,  and  displacement.  The   indicate  a  greater  likelihood  of  flooding,  while  lower
                                                           36
                Shuttle  Radar  Topography Mission with a digital   values suggest a lower risk. To categorize flood risk, the



                Volume 22 Issue 2 (2025)                        73                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025040019
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84