Page 444 - IJB-10-3

International Journal of Bioprinting Different modeling of porous scaffolds

Figure 9. (A) Permeability of different scaffolds. (B) Permeability of scaffolds prepared in this work as compared to those in other published studies. 47,58,59
Abbreviations: D, Diamond; G, Gyroid; IW-P, I-graph-wrapped package; P, Primitive.

methods can provide sufficient support and surface well-connected to fluid passages, posing minimal hindrance
area to safeguard the transport of waste nutrients and to fluid flow. As a result, they exhibit relatively higher
cell migration. permeability. In contrast, G and D structure scaffolds have
complex internal structures with curved spiral designs that
Figure 10 displays different flow velocity cloud maps accelerate fluid flow, creating varying velocity gradients.
in fluid simulations. It can be observed that P and IW-P These structures impede fluid flow to a greater extent,
structure scaffolds have larger pore sizes, and their pores are leading to lower permeability, especially in the case of D
60

Figure 10. Flow velocity cloud maps for different scaffolds cells. Abbreviations: D, Diamond; G, Gyroid; IW-P, I-graph-wrapped package; P, Primitive.

Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024) 436 doi: 10.36922/ijb.2565