Page 203 - IJB-10-4
P. 203

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   Horsetail-inspired lattice for bone use



























































              Figure 6. (A) The plot of A against r and (B) corresponding surface plot with t; and (C) the plot of φ against r and (d) corresponding 3D plot with t.

               We observed that isotropy characteristics of the RVE is   the strut member would not be effective in taking axial
            dependent on r but shows less correlation with t (and thus φ)    loading, and the bulk material making up the RVE is out of
            in Figure 6. This implies that directionality is dependent   phase to the location of the strut members. The transition
            on the general form of the RVEs, which is driven by   point, where A ≈ 1, occurs at the intermediate r. This is the
            geometry  of  the  cross-sectional  area.  The  discovery  of   area of interest for our study as the isotropic nature would
            such decoupling condition is ideal when designing for   allow ease of the bone scaffold design.
            bone-related application as it prevents convoluted effects.   3.2. Stretching and bending dominance of RVEs to
            We observe that A >> 1 at smaller r and transits to A << 1    elastic modulus correlation
            at bigger r. Referencing Figure 5, at smaller r, the peaks   We evaluated the stretching and bending dominance
            of directional response are where the strut members of   of the RVEs with variations in  r, to characterize the
            the RVEs are and would intuitively provide displacement   performance of the RVEs. Stretch-dominated lattices
            resistance in the axial direction, better than perpendicular   would display higher stiffness compared to bending-
            loading. Conversely, at bigger  r, the hollow portions of   dominated lattices  as governed by the empirical
                                                                               38

            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       195                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2326
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208