Page 244 - IJB-10-6
P. 244

International Journal of Bioprinting                                DIW of concave hydroxyapatite scaffolds




               The strain energy density (SED) displayed in Figure 6c3    3.5. In vitro study
            indicates the toughness of the scaffolds, i.e., the energy   The results of SaOs-2 cell adhesion on the different scaffolds
            required for scaffold breakage normalized by the external   are presented in Figure 7a. The seeding efficiency for all
            scaffold volume. The OP scaffold reported the highest SED   scaffolds is low, especially for the OP scaffold, which is
            (0.62 ± 0.13 MJ/m ), followed by the S geometry (0.37 ± 0.20   typical of porous scaffolds. 65,66  In addition, CDHA is known
                          3
            MJ/m ), with no statistically significant difference between   to promote ionic exchange due to its high bioactivity,
                3
            them. The OP scaffold was broken upon column splitting   which reduces cell adhesion in static conditions.  Among
                                                                                                      67
            (Figure 6b), consistent with the critical fracture points   the different TPMS-based scaffolds, significant differences
                                                   63
            identified from a finite element simulation study,  and the   were observed for G and D geometries compared to OP
            breakage was more abrupt than the progressive compaction   (Figure 7a). A similar trend was observed after a day of
            observed for the S scaffolds. The SED for the G and D scaffolds   culture, and similar cell proliferation was reported for all
            was significantly lower at 0.23 ± 0.05 and 0.13 ± 0.05 MJ/m ,   the scaffolds on days 1, 7, and 14 (Figure 7b). Statistically
                                                         3
            respectively, similar to the trend observed for compressive   significant differences were observed only on day 21, where
            strength, though no significant differences were observed   cell proliferation was higher in the TPMS-based scaffolds
            between them. Moreover, their breaking mechanism was   compared to OP scaffolds.
            more similar to the S structure than to the OP, i.e., without
            any abrupt breakage. Finally, the Weibull modulus was not   Regarding cell differentiation, higher ALP activity
            affected by pore architecture (Figure 6c (iv)).    was observed on day 1 for all TPMS-based structures
                                                               compared to OP; the ALP activity for all TPMS-based
               Comparing our results with those of other studies   structures was relatively similar to OP structure on day 7;
            is challenging due to the high dependence on material,   the ALP activity for G and D structures was higher than
            porosity, and manufacturing process. For instance,   the OP structure on day 14 (Figure 7c). At the end of the
            utilizing a sintering process to harden the green body in   culture period (day 21), all TPMS-based scaffolds reported
            CaP scaffolds results in significantly enhanced mechanical   similar ALP levels, which were higher than the OP scaffold
            properties compared to scaffolds produced via a biomimetic   but lower than the control.
            route (similar to this study) due to microstructural
            differences. 37,64  However, two studies focusing on TPMS   Mineralization  was  measured  via  AR  quantification
            primarily composed of CaP materials can be compared   after 14 days (Figure 7d). Similarly, mineralization was
            to  the  present  study.  Sintered  hydroxyapatite  (HA)  G   highest for the G structure, followed by the D structure.
            structures with 10% åkermanite were manufactured by Shi   No differences were observed between the S and OP
            et al. through SL technology, resulting in a slightly lower   structures, both of which were slightly higher than the
            compressive strength (≈2 MPa) and elastic modulus (≈0.3   control. After 21 days, G and D structures displayed
            GPa) than the biomimetic G structures in the present   similar values, with the S structure exhibiting a significant
            study, despite having twice the porosity.  In addition, a   increase from its value on day 14. Notably, the high ALP
                                             30
            twofold improvement in the mechanical properties was   levels  in the control samples  did not result in increased
            achieved by introducing radial porosity gradients from   mineralization. The natural tendency of high ALP levels
            50% to 80%, closely mimicking the natural anisotropy of   promoting mineralization may be affected by other factors.
            bone. Likewise, Zhang et al. produced six different TPMS   Topographical or compositional aspects could play a role,
            structures (including G, D, and S structures) of pure HA   but further studies are warranted to clarify their effects on
            using SL technology coupled with a high-temperature   cell maturation. CaP is known to be more bioactive and
            sintering process.  Between the G, D, and S structures,   cell-stimulating substrates compared to inert cover glass,
                          28
            the D structure exhibited the highest compressive strength   providing biochemical and physical cues, including ionic
            (≈110  MPa),  followed by  the  S  (≈90  MPa),  and  G  (≈25   fluctuations, absent in the glass substrate. For example,
            MPa) structures. However, the results are inconclusive   the measured intracellular ALP values do not directly
            due to differing porosities, which resulted from unequal   translate to ALP release, as the concentrations of calcium
            shrinkage during sintering, i.e., ≈35% for G, ≈45% for D,   and phosphate in the medium, mediated by a CaP scaffold,
                                                                                                 68
            and ≈55% for S structures. Notably, the absolute values   affect ALP release from SaOS-2 cells.  In contrast,
            between these studies and our results cannot be directly   differentiation in the control samples is confluent-induced,
            compared as the layer height and resolution are also   i.e., depending on the cell density, which can be more
            significantly different between SL and DIW printing.   variable and slower.  Regardless of the presence of ALP
                                                                               69
            Nonetheless, the biomimetic approach adopted in the   protein, subsequent mineralization is assumed to be
            present study avoided scaffold shrinkage, which mitigated   triggered by enzymatic hydrolysis, especially in  in vitro
            subsequent dimensional variations.                 environments.  Nevertheless, the presence of concavities
                                        39
                                                                          70
            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       236                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3805
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249