Page 197 - IJB-9-2
P. 197

International Journal of Bioprinting              A regulated GelMA-MSCs scaffold by three-dimensional bioprinting



            A                                                B






























            Figure 7. Micro-CT scanning and quantitative Analysis. (A) Sagittal cross-sectional 2D images of the femoral condyle of rabbits in each group by micro-CT
            scan. (B) Analysis of BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N, and Tb.Sp parameters in subchondral bone defect of femoral condyle of rabbits in each group. Among the three
            groups, the GelMA-microRNA-410-MSCs group had the best subchondral bone repair effect, and there was a statistical difference between the 6-week and
            12-week groups compared with the former two groups (sample size = 18. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

            A                                                  existed in the blank group. However, the subchondral bone
                                                               defect was filled with a large amount of matrix in the GelMA-
                                                               MSCs group, and the position of the new chondrocytes and
                                                               collagen was not stretched. In the GelMA-microRNA-410-
                                                               MSCs group, the repair effect of the overall subchondral bone
                                                               and surface defects was better than that of the blank group
            B                                                  and the GelMA-MSCs group, and both new collagen and
                                                               osteoblasts were densely distributed at the defect repair site,
                                                               while the surface defect was not completely repaired. At week
                                                               12, there were a few sparse deposits of nascent collagen and
                                                               osteoblasts in the blank group. However, the subchondral
            C                                                  bone defect was filled with more new matrix deposition in
                                                               the GelMA-MSCs group. It also can be observed that new
                                                               osteoblasts were attached to the periphery of new bone
                                                               trabeculae, and new collagen was spread around chondrocytes.
                                                               In the GelMA-microRNA-410-MSCs group, the defect repair
                                                               effect was the best among the three groups, both surface
                                                               cartilage defects and subchondral bone defects were effectively
            Figure 8. The three groups of specimens were stained by HE, Masson’s   repaired, and the matrix was almost indistinguishable from
            trichrome, and S-O FS staining at weeks 6 and 12, respectively. (A)
            New chondrocytes were orange-red in HE staining. (B) Cartilage   the neighboring tissue. The above results indicated that the
            collagen fibers were blue in Masson staining. (C) Osteoblasts are green   microRNA-410 can promote cartilage defect repair.
            and chondroblasts were red in S-O FS staining. Notes: defect sutured
            without any treatment (Blank), GelMA scaffolds containing only MSCs   4. Discussion
            transplanted into the defect (GelMA-MSCs), and GelMA scaffolds
            containing MSCs with upregulated microRNA-410 transplanted into the   Articular cartilage tissue repair is challenging due to the
            defect (GelMA-microRNA-410-MSCs).                  limited self-regeneration potential of native cartilage.  When



            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                        189                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.662
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202