Page 392 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Vascularized bone regeneration

Writing – review & editing: Changru Zhang, Ya Ren, Yihao 8. Yu M, Du Y, Han Y, et al., 2020, Biomimetic elastomeric
Liu, Kerong Dai, Jinwu Wang bioactive siloxane-based hybrid nanofibrous scaffolds with
miRNA activation: A joint physico-chemical-biological
Ethics approval and consent to participate strategy for promoting bone regeneration. Adv Funct Mater,
30(4): 1906013.
The animal experiment in this study was approved by the https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201906013
Animal Research Committee of Ninth People’s Hospital,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (License 9. Chen Q, Yu S, Zhang D, et al., 2019, Impact of antifouling PEG
number: SH9H-2020-T269-4). layer on the performance of functional peptides in regulating
cell behaviors. J Am Chem Soc, 141(42): 16772–16780.
Consent for publication https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b07105
Not applicable. 10. Zhang X, Chen X, Hong H, et al., 2022, Decellularized
extracellular matrix scaffolds: Recent trends and emerging
Availability of data strategies in tissue engineering. Bioact Mater, 10: 15–31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.014
The data that support the findings of this study are available
from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. 11. Chen X, Wang M, Chen F, et al., 2020, Correlations between
macrophage polarization and osteoinduction of porous
References calcium phosphate ceramics. Acta Biomater, 103: 318–332.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.019
1. Petersen A, Princ A, Korus G, et al., 2018, A biomaterial 12. Zhao F, Yang Z, Xiong H, et al., 2023, A bioactive glass
with a channel-like pore architecture induces endochondral functional hydrogel enhances bone augmentation via
healing of bone defects. Nat Commun, 9(1): 4430. synergistic angiogenesis, self-swelling and osteogenesis.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06504-7 Bioact Mater, 22: 201–210.
2. Okuchi Y, Reeves J, Ng SS, et al., 2021, Wnt-modified https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.09.007
materials mediate asymmetric stem cell division to direct 13. Aleman J, Kilic T, Mille LS, et al., 2021, Microfluidic
human osteogenic tissue formation for bone repair. Nat integration of regeneratable electrochemical affinity-based
Mater, 20(1): 108–118. biosensors for continual monitoring of organ-on-a-chip
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0786-5 devices. Nat Protoc, 16(5): 2564–2593.
3. Salhotra A, Shah HN, Levi B, et al., 2020, Mechanisms of https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00511-7
bone development and repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 21(11): 14. Zhao H, Liang G, Liang W, et al., 2020, In vitro and in
696–711. vivo evaluation of the pH-neutral bioactive glass as high
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-00279-w performance bone grafts. Mater Sc Eng C, 116: 111249.
4. Zhao R, Shang T, Yuan B, et al., 2022, Osteoporotic https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111249
bone recovery by a bamboo-structured bioceramic with 15. Zhao F, Xie W, Zhang W, et al., 2018, 3D printing nanoscale
controlled release of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Bioact bioactive glass scaffolds enhance osteoblast migration
Mater, 17: 379–393. and extramembranous osteogenesis through stimulating
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.007 immunomodulation. Adv Healthc Mater, 7(16): e1800361.
5. Hao J, Bai B, Ci Z, et al., 2022, Large-sized bone defect https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800361
repair by combining a decalcified bone matrix framework 16. Zheng X, Zhang X, Wang Y, et al., 2021, Hypoxia-mimicking
and bone regeneration units based on photo-crosslinkable 3D bioglass-nanoclay scaffolds promote endogenous bone
osteogenic microgels. Bioact Mater, 14: 97–109. regeneration. Bioact Mater, 6(10): 3485–3495.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.011
6. Feng B, Zhang M, Qin C, et al., 2023, 3D printing of conch- 17. Zhi W, Wang X, Sun D, et al., 2022, Optimal regenerative
like scaffolds for guiding cell migration and directional bone repair of large segmental bone defect in a goat model with
growth. Bioact Mater, 22: 127–140. osteoinductive calcium phosphate bioceramic implants.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.09.014 Bioact Mater, 11: 240–253.
7. Liu H, Du Y, St-Pierre J-P, et al., 2020, Bioenergetic-active https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.024
materials enhance tissue regeneration by modulating 18. Koons GL, Diba Mand Mikos AG, 2020, Materials design for
cellular metabolic state. Sci Adv, 6(13): eaay7608. bone-tissue engineering. Nat Rev Mater, 5(8): 584–603.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay7608 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0204-2

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 384 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.767