Page 173 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printing in gastroenterology

of therapy response, and organ/tissue replacement for 6. Ballard DH, Wake N, Witowski J, et al., 2020, Radiological
precision medicine are what we are now endeavoring to Society of North America (RSNA) 3D Printing Special
explore. More importantly, we need to discover areas that Interest Group (SIG) clinical situations for which 3D printing
we have not tried with 3D printing, where it might boost is considered an appropriate representation or extension
medical progress and bring real benefits to patients. of data contained in a medical imaging examination:
Abdominal, hepatobiliary, and gastrointestinal conditions.
Acknowledgments 3D Print Med, 6(1): 13.
http://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00065-6
None.
7. Marconi S, Pugliese L, Botti M, et al., 2017, Value of 3D
Funding printing for the comprehension of surgical anatomy. Surg
Endosc, 31(10): 4102–4110.
None.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5457-5
Conflict of interest 8. Li C, Zheng B, Yu Q, et al., 2021, Augmented reality and
3-dimensional printing technologies for guiding complex
The authors declare no conflict of interest. thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 112(5): 1624–1631.

Author contributions http://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.10.037
Conceptualization: Yuhang Zhang, Bing Hu 9. Pietrabissa A, Marconi S, Negrello E, et al., 2020, An
Writing – original draft: Yuhang Zhang, Liuxiang Chen overview on 3D printing for abdominal surgery. Surg
Endosc, 34(1): 1–13.
Writing – review & editing: Yuhang Zhang
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07155-5
Ethics approval and consent to participate 10. Farhat W, Chatelain F, Marret A, et al., 2021, Trends in 3D
Not applicable. bioprinting for esophageal tissue repair and reconstruction.
Biomaterials, 267: 120465.
Consent for publication http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120465

Not applicable. 11. Vrana NE, Gupta S, Mitra K, et al., 2000, From 3D printing
to 3D bioprinting: The material properties of polymeric
Availability of data material and its derived bioink for achieving tissue specific
architectures. Cell Tissue Bank, 23(3): 417–440.
Not applicable.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-021-09975-z
Reference 12. Willson K, Atala A, 2022, Medical 3D printing: tools and
techniques, today and tomorrow. Annu Rev Chem Biomol
1. Williams EM, 1984, Computer automated manufacturing Eng, 13: 481–499.
process and system. US4665492A, July 2, 1984.
http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092220-015404
2. Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, et al., 2016, 3D-printing
techniques in a medical setting: A systematic literature 13. Zhang J, Wehrle E, Rubert M, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting of
review. Biomed Eng Online, 15(1): 115. human tissues: Biofabrication, bioinks, and bioreactors. Int J
Mol Sci, 22(8).
http://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22083971
3. Aimar A, Palermo A, Innocenti B, 2019, The role of 3D
printing in medical applications: A state of the art. J Healthc 14. Dickinson KJ, Matsumoto J, Cassivi SD, et al., 2015,
Eng, 2019: 5340616. Individualizing management of complex esophageal
pathology using three-dimensional printed models. Ann
http://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5340616 Thorac Surg, 100(2): 692–697.
4. Brachet A, Bełżek A, Furtak D, et al., 2023, Application of http://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.115
3D printing in bone grafts. Cells, 12(6).
15. Hamada K, Taniyama Y, Yashima Y, et al., 2022,
http://doi.org/10.3390/cells12060859 Determination of the best surgical strategy for thoracic
5. Sharbidre KG, Aziz MU, Mohd Z, 2022, Review of abdominal esophageal resection concurrent with double aortic arch
vascular variations: Imaging and clinical implications. using a three-dimensional model: A case report. Transl
Radiographics, 42(1): E27–E28. Cancer Res, 11(9): 3322–3328.
http://doi.org/10.1148/rg.210093 http://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-468

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 165 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0149