Page 103 - MSAM-3-2
P. 103

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                            NiTi lattice: Performance optimization



              The strain positions of the flying out of large fragments,   value of ε  strain of I-WP was smaller, and the strain range
                                                                      1
            ε , of the two samples of BCC lattice structures were   that can effectively absorb energy was smaller. Therefore,
             1
            12.86% and 15.69%, respectively, while those of I-WP   the total energy absorption of I-WP was lower. The energy
            samples were 8.95% and 11.98%, respectively. The ε  strain   absorption per unit strain of these two lattice structures at
                                                     1
            positions of BCC samples were slightly larger than those   ε  strain was calculated. The values for BCC and I-WP were
                                                                1
            of I-WP, which may be due to the smaller diameter of the   0.53 J and 0.48 J, respectively, suggesting that the ability of
            middle positions of the struts of the I-WP lattice structures   NiTi BCC to absorb energy is slightly stronger.
            and the more concentrated stress distribution, which made   Figure  4B presents the energy absorption capacity
            it easier for the applied load to exceed the strength limit   of two NiTi lattice structures. First, in the linear elastic
            during the compression tests, resulting in the collapse and   stage, the stress values of the lattice structures increased
            fracture of I-WP lattices before the BCC lattices.  uniformly with  the  gradual increase of  strain,  and its
              Figure 4A shows the rise of total energy absorption of   energy absorption efficiencies also increased uniformly
            these two structures with the increase of strain. At the same   with the increase of strain. Then, it is worth noting that
            strain position, the total energy absorption values were   after entering the plateau stage, the pillars of the lattice
            very close. Figure 4C-E show that the values of E, EPV,   structures began to yield and deform, and finally break,
            and SEA of the BCC lattice structure and are higher than   manifested as a rapid decline in the stress–strain curves.
            those of the I-WP lattice structure at the ε  strain position.   At  this  strain  position,  the  energy  absorption  efficiency
                                             1
            Although, as shown in (Figure  4A), the total energy   curves had an inflection point and rose rapidly. According
            absorption of I-WP was not inferior to that of BCC, the   to the definition and formula of the energy absorption

                         A                                          C











                                                                    D






                         B






                                                                    E














            Figure 4. The energy absorption capacity of two Nickel titanium (NiTi) lattice structures: (A) The total energy absorption-strain curves of the NiTi lattice
            structures; (B) The energy absorption efficiency-strain curves of the NiTi lattice structures; (C) The total energy absorption (E); (D) The energy absorption
            per unit volume (EPV); (E) The specific energy absorption (SEA).


            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2024)                         6                              doi: 10.36922/msam.3380
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108