Page 209 - IJB-9-5
P. 209

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     Using droplet jetting for bioprinting



            the  substrate–material interaction  for non-Newtonian   References
            materials like cell-laden polymeric systems. In the case
            of cell-laden hydrogels, which are commonly used to   1.   Mir TA, Iwanaga S, Kurooka T, et al., 2019, Biofabrication
            deliver and deposit materials in bioprinting, increasing   offers future hope for tackling various obstacles and
            our  understanding  of  how  jetted  droplets  interact  with   challenges in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine:
            different receiving substrates is essential to understanding   A perspective. Int J Bioprint, 5(1):153–163.
            the impact phase of jetting processes. The concept of   2.  Liu F, et al., 2018, Progress in organ 3D bioprinting. Int J
            hybrid bioprinting, which combines the use of multiple   Bioprint, 4(1):128–142.
            fabrication processes, adds value to bioprinted construct   3.   Ng WL, Yeong WY, 2019, The future of skin toxicology
            by improving its structural integrity and biological   testing—Three-dimensional bioprinting meets microfluidics.
            function. The key to integrating different manufacturing   Int J Bioprint, 5(2.1):237.
            technologies lies in understanding material interactions to   4.   Jang T-S, Jung H-D, Pan MH, et al., 2018, 3D printing of
            leverage the distinct advantages of each biomanufacturing   hydrogel composite systems: Recent advances in technology
            process and introduce increased form and functionality to   for tissue engineering. Int J Bioprint, 4(1):126–153.
            bioprinted constructs.
                                                               5.   Lee JM, Yeong WY, 2018, Data processing for multi-material
            Acknowledgments                                       3d bioprinting, in C.K. Chua, W.Y. Yeong, M.J. et al., Eds., in
                                                                  Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Progress in
            The authors would like to thank HP Team who have      Additive Manufacturing, 164–169,
            proofread and commented on the manuscript.            https//doi.org/10.25341/d4x599. [Online]. Available: <Go
                                                                  to ISI>://WOS:000485804300026
            Funding
                                                               6.   Ng WL, Chan A, Ong YS, et al., 2020, Deep learning for
            This  study  is  supported  under  the  RIE2020  Industry   fabrication and maturation of 3D bioprinted tissues and
            Alignment Fund – Industry Collaboration Projects (IAF-  organs. Virtual Phys Prototyp.
            ICP)  Funding  Initiative, as  well  as  cash  and  in-kind   https//doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.1771741
            contribution from the industry partner, HP Inc., through   7.   Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Hydrogels for 3-D
            the HP-NTU Digital Manufacturing Corporate Lab.
                                                                  bioprinting-based tissue engineering, in Rapid Prototyping
                                                                  of Biomaterials, R. Narayan Ed. Chapel Hill, NC: Elsevier,
            Conflict of interest                                  183–204.

            The authors declare no conflict of interests.      8.   Gardan J, 2019, Smart materials in additive manufacturing:
                                                                  State of the art and trends. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 14(1):1–18.
            Author contributions                               9.   Lee  JM,  Sing  SL,  Zhou  M,  et al.,  2018,  3D  bioprinting

            Conceptualization: Jia Min Lee                        processes: A perspective on classification and terminology.
            Writing – original draft: Jia Min Lee, Xi Huang, Guo Liang   Int J Bioprint, 4(2):151.
               Goh                                                https//doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v4i2.151
            Writing – review & editing: Jia Min Lee, Tuan Tran, Wai   10.  Ahn S, Lee H, Kim G, 2013, Functional cell-laden
               Yee Yeong                                          alginate scaffolds consisting of core/shell struts for tissue
                                                                  regeneration. Carbohydr Polym, 98(1):936–942.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate
                                                                  https//doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.07.008
            Not applicable.
                                                               11.  Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T,  et al., 2014, The 3D
                                                                  printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-
            Consent for publication                               engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials,
            Not applicable.                                       35(1):49–62.
                                                                  https//doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078
            Availability of data
                                                               12.  Duan B, Hockaday LA, Kang KH, et al., 2013, 3D bioprinting
            Not applicable.                                       of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin
                                                                  hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 101(5):1255–1264.
            Further disclosure                                    https//doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34420
            Part of or the entire set of findings has been presented in a   13.  Fedorovich NE, Wijnberg HM, Dhert WJ,  et al., 2011,
            conference, academic meeting, congress, etc.          Distinct tissue formation  by heterogeneous  printing  of


            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        201                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.758
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214